Welcome to Roya News, stay informed with the most important news at your fingertips.

1
Image 1 from gallery
اقرأ بالعربية
اقرأ بالعربية

Iran seeks realistic Muscat deal as talks hinge on ending threats

Listen to this story:
0:00

Note: AI technology was used to generate this article’s audio.

Published :  
4 hours ago|
  • Iran says Muscat talks aim for a practical agreement with tangible outcomes.
  • Tehran ties success to commitments, mutual respect, and an end to threatening rhetoric.

Iran is entering talks in Muscat with a vision focused on reaching a “realistic” agreement that delivers concrete results on the ground, according to Iranian officials cited Friday by the state news agency IRNA.

The comments signal an effort by Tehran to lower tensions through Omani-mediated diplomacy after months of pressure and stalled engagement.


Read more: Iran’s Araghchi arrives Oman for talks with US


Conditions for progress

Officials said the success of any deal rests on three core pillars: full adherence to commitments, mutual respect among the parties, and an immediate halt to the language of threats.

“These principles are essential for any meaningful outcome,” the officials said, underscoring Tehran’s insistence that negotiations move beyond rhetoric toward implementation.

Diplomatic recalibration

The remarks reflect Iran’s attempt to redirect international pressure into a negotiating track that searches for middle-ground solutions, particularly as Washington reassesses its approach to the nuclear file.


Read more: Iran hints at long-term nuclear pause as US talks begin in Oman: Report


Oman has long served as a discreet channel between Iran and the United States, and Muscat’s role is again seen as pivotal in testing whether diplomacy can contain escalation.

What comes next

Talks in Muscat are expected to probe areas of possible compromise while gauging whether the parties can align on tone and substance. Iranian officials indicated that progress will depend on whether counterparts demonstrate readiness to shift from coercive language to reciprocal commitments.