Hamas appeals UK terror listing, claims political motive behind ban

Hamas has launched a legal challenge to overturn its designation as a terrorist organization by the UK.

The Palestinian group instructed British lawyers to appeal the 2021 decision made by then-Home Secretary Priti Patel, who expanded the UK’s existing ban on Hamas’ military wing to include the entire organization, citing no clear distinction between its political and armed branches.

Mousa Abu Marzouk, head of Hamas' foreign relations, directed the legal team—comprising Riverway Law and barristers Daniel Grutters and Franck Magennis—to submit a 106-page appeal to current Home Secretary Yvette Cooper. The appeal claims the proscription served “explicitly political objectives” and was issued by a “politically compromised” official.

Lawyers emphasized that no payments were received from Hamas, as UK law prohibits receiving funds from designated terrorist groups.

The appeal argues that the ban stifles political dialogue, criminalizes Palestinians in Gaza, and blocks efforts toward a peaceful resolution. It compares Hamas' case to historical examples like the ANC in South Africa and the IRA in Northern Ireland, asserting that the label of terrorism prevents negotiation and political transition.

Hamas also contends that the designation infringes on free speech, academic freedom, and public discourse on Palestine, creating a chilling effect across UK institutions. It warns that humanitarian aid to Gaza is threatened, as any assistance risks being interpreted as supporting terrorism.

“Regardless of your view on Hamas, stifling discussion is counterproductive and blocks the path to peace,” said barrister Daniel Grutters.

Under the Terrorism Act 2000, the home secretary has 90 days to respond. If rejected, Hamas can appeal to the Proscribed Organisations Appeal Commission.

The UK Home Office has not yet commented.