Public sector criticism mounts against new labor regulations

Unrest fills the streets of Jordan following the introduction of the government’s new Human Resources Law, which critics argue severely impacts public sector employees' rights and livelihoods.

The legislation, touted as a reform measure, has been met with widespread criticism from within the public sector. According to government workers, the law creates a restrictive environment that hampers career advancement and fails to improve living standards.

Key provisions of the law include an absolute prohibition on employees working outside official hours and a reduction in the duration of unpaid leave. 

Previously seen as opportunities for supplemental income and personal development, these changes come at a critical time of economic hardship characterized by low wages and rising living costs.

Economic and administrative experts have raised concerns over the clarity and fairness of several aspects of the law. 

Particularly contentious is a provision that grants authorities the power to enforce early retirement on employees without their consent. 

Critics argue this undermines job security and employee rights, potentially leading to unintended consequences for individuals and families reliant on public-sector employment.

Another contentious issue is the basis for determining salaries, which is now linked more closely to job positions rather than individual qualifications. This shift, experts warn, could lead to disparities and undervalue the skills and experience of many employees.

Government officials have defended the law as essential for modernizing the public sector and improving efficiency. They assert that aligning salaries with job roles will streamline operations and help achieve fiscal sustainability in government departments.

The average monthly salary for public sector workers stands at approximately JD595, a figure deemed insufficient given the country's high cost of living and indirect taxes.