Welcome to Roya News, stay informed with the most important news at your fingertips.

Pro-Palestine protests on Cornell University campus.

1
Image 1 from gallery

Outrage over Cornell University’s handling of Gaza protest against sexual assault lawsuit

Listen to this story:
0:00

Note: AI technology was used to generate this article’s audio.

Published :  
15 hours ago|

Social media users have condemned Cornell University for what they describe as a stark double standard in handling pro-Palestinian protests versus a 2024 sexual assault case involving fraternity members.

Outrage intensified after a former student filed a civil lawsuit in mid-September 2026 alleging she was drugged and gang-raped by seven members of the Chi Phi fraternity at their on-campus house on October 19, 2024.

The plaintiff, unnamed and identified only as a Jane Doe, said she was plied with alcohol and a substance described as ketamine before being assaulted for hours while incapacitated.

A Snapchat group chat message allegedly invited others to join, referring to “free p***y.”

No criminal charges were filed at the time; the Tompkins County District Attorney’s office cited insufficient evidence based on her initial statement.

Cornell’s Title IX process resulted in a range of sanctions, including expulsions and suspensions for some of the men, while the fraternity chapter was barred from campus.

The university has declined to detail individual punishments citing privacy laws.

On Monday, District Attorney Matthew Van Houten announced he would reopen the criminal investigation and present the case to a grand jury following public pressure and the lawsuit.

Cornell supported the move, stating it had conducted a thorough internal investigation with temporary suspensions and a multi-day hearing panel that imposed consequential sanctions.

“Any suggestion that the university did not impose consequential punishments for those involved is false,” the university said.

“A continuation of the false narrative that there were minimal consequences in this case is irresponsible.”

The plaintiff’s attorney has said only two of the seven were expelled, with others receiving lesser measures such as suspensions, workshops, or essays.

Critics on X highlighted a contrast with the university’s response to Gaza-related protests.

In 2024 and 2025, Cornell suspended more than 30 students—mostly for pro-Palestinian activity—and arrested or detained dozens during encampments, career-fair disruptions, and event walkouts.

Students for Justice in Palestine faced temporary bans, and some international students risked visa issues.

“Cornell suspended 50+ students for demanding divestment from the genocide in Gaza,” one post noted, while another declared, “At Cornell, the Administration will protect you unless you protest #GazaGenocide.”

Viral posts framed the disparity sharply.

“So @Cornell suspends students for protesting genocide, but not for rape?” asked one user whose post gained nearly 100,000 likes.

Another wrote: “If those Cornell rapists had written ‘free Palestine’ in that group chat instead of ‘free p*ssy’ they would have faced a harsher punishment.”

A third observed: “22 students arrested for protesting a genocide. 7 men gang raped a woman for hours. Zero arrests. Cornell, explain the difference.”

Comments accused the university of protecting alleged perpetrators while swiftly punishing anti-war demonstrators.

 

Cornell has maintained it takes sexual violence “extremely seriously,” pointing to a Presidential Task Force launched after the 2024 incident and its March 2026 recommendations.

It has also defended protest-related discipline as necessary to protect campus operations and safety under its expressive activity policies.

The case has drawn national attention, with prosecutors now preparing grand jury review amid intense online scrutiny.

Jane Doe’s lawsuit continues against the seven men, the fraternity, Cornell, and other parties.