Iran accuses US of MoU breach over failure to stop 'Israeli' attacks in Lebanon

Iranian Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei announced that the initiation of negotiations aimed at reaching a final peace accord is strictly conditional upon the immediate and continuous implementation of five foundational clauses outlined in the joint memorandum of understanding (MoU).

Baghaei clarified that a diplomatic meeting originally scheduled for Friday in Switzerland was officially canceled after the presidents of both nations executed a digital signature on the MoU.

The completion of this digital signing process effectively removed the sense of operational urgency that had previously been attached to the gathering.

Negotiations frozen over non-compliance

According to the official spokesperson, the text of the agreement establishes a clear, legal linkage between forward diplomatic progress and real-world compliance.

Baghaei pointed specifically to Clause 13 of the agreement, which dictates that launching the formal negotiation track toward a finalized formula is explicitly contingent upon the opposing side activating and sustaining its written obligations under Clauses 1, 4, 5, 10, and 11.

The Foreign Ministry verified that this operational prerequisite has not yet been fulfilled.

Baghaei attributed the current deadlock entirely to the opposing side's failure to adhere to its written commitments, stating that the entire diplomatic file remains frozen until the practical implementation of this specific clause is achieved.

Diplomatic efforts over strict enforcement

Shifting focus to the parameters of Iran's ongoing diplomatic movements, Baghaei underscored that future field visits and diplomatic engagements will be heavily administrative and enforcement-driven rather than exploratory.

The primary objective of the upcoming diplomatic track will be to demand compliance and conduct field follow-ups, forcing the opposing side to execute what was formally agreed upon through official channels.

Baghaei concluded by stating that the next diplomatic steps are aimed specifically at clarifying the exact mechanisms and methods by which the counterparty will fulfill these stalled commitments.

He emphasized that the true benchmark for measuring the success and credibility of any political agreement lies solely within its transition into practical, real-world implementation.