Welcome to Roya News, stay informed with the most important news at your fingertips.

1
Image 1 from gallery

Trump expands Green Card screening to include social media posts on ‘Israel’: NYT

Listen to this story:
0:00

Note: AI technology was used to generate this article’s audio.

Published :  
3 hours ago|
  • The Trump administration has reportedly tightened Green Card screening with expanded social media reviews.
  • Online posts, including commentary related to ‘Israel’, may now carry greater weight in residency decisions.

The administration of US President Donald Trump has introduced stricter procedures for reviewing permanent residency applications, with immigration authorities placing increased scrutiny on applicants’ social media activity and political views, according to a report by The New York Times.

The report says digital activity across platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, and X is now being reviewed more extensively as part of the Green Card evaluation process.

According to the report, immigration officials are paying particular attention to applicants’ online posts and interactions following the events of October 7, a period that triggered heightened political tensions and increased scrutiny of public commentary related to ‘Israel’.

The review process reportedly considers social media content as part of broader background checks used to assess eligibility for permanent residency.

Officials may weigh digital footprints alongside traditional documentation when making final determinations on applications.

Social media screening has long existed within US immigration procedures, but the report describes the current approach as significantly more comprehensive.

The increased emphasis reflects broader efforts by the administration to expand national security screening tools in immigration processing.

The review can include public posts, shared content, political commentary, and online affiliations.

The reported measures have prompted concern among civil liberties groups, who argue that closer examination of political speech could raise questions about freedom of expression and viewpoint discrimination.

Supporters of the policy argue that expanded digital vetting is necessary to identify potential security concerns and ensure more rigorous screening standards.