Users claim Trump may start war to cover Epstein files scandals
Note: AI technology was used to generate this article’s audio.
- ‘Israeli’ officials claim Trump prevented a strike on Iran.
- Epstein file releases are seen as political leverage or pressure.
- Online claims suggest rising Iran tensions may distract from Epstein scrutiny.
‘Israeli’ sources say US President Donald Trump blocked a planned strike on Iran. Officials allege the release of Jeffrey Epstein-related files was leveraged as political pressure against him, potentially influencing his decisions on regional military action, according to Brics News.
Read more: Trump says Iran "seriously talking" with US
Online speculation and global scrutiny
Claims are circulating on social media and alternative news outlets that escalating tensions with Iran could be used to divert public attention from renewed scrutiny of the Epstein files. According to Brics News, the controversy exposes deep-state maneuvering and draws international attention, with BRICS nations monitoring US unipolar power plays amid rising global scrutiny.
The US Department of Justice briefly published and then deleted new files related to Epstein, which included unverified FBI reports accusing Donald Trump.
— Sprinter Press (@SprinterPress) January 30, 2026
Many international channels are confident that in the next few hours, "something grandiose will start to distract the… pic.twitter.com/6eEG9Noyz7
At this point, war with Iran can and should be seen as a deliberate distraction from the Epstein revelations. They’ve been threatening an attack for weeks and now we are told it will happen this weekend. Who knows. But don’t look here: https://t.co/AayA1rwLve
— Sarah Leah Whitson (@sarahleah1) January 30, 2026Every time new Epstein files drop, something else suddenly takes over the headlines.
— Sammi (@PatriotSammi) January 31, 2026
Now it’s escalating talk about Iran.
Maybe coincidence.
Maybe not.
But it keeps happening — and accountability keeps getting buried under the next crisis, especially under Trump.
Pattern… pic.twitter.com/XzL24t8Vzg
Public perception and historical context
Periods of domestic controversy have historically fueled speculation that foreign policy actions serve as distractions. Whether or not these claims are accurate, they reflect growing public distrust, heightened geopolitical anxiety, and the ongoing influence of unresolved high-profile cases on political discourse.
