Ghalibaf: Iran won't recognize 'Israel,' no peace with US

• Ghalibaf said implementing the new US agreement will be "difficult but doable."
• He said diplomacy should reinforce the strategic gains of the "axis of resistance."
• Ghalibaf also claimed the agreement includes provisions on regional territorial integrity and halting hostilities against Iran's allies.

Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf defended the Islamic Republic's recent diplomatic breakthrough with Washington during a high-profile meeting with the head of the Hamas political bureau's leadership council on Sunday.

Addressing the fierce domestic and regional debate surrounding the accord, Ghalibaf characterized the implementation phase of the preliminary agreement as "difficult but doable," while emphasizing that the diplomatic track does not signal a foundational realignment of Iran's ideological principles.

Diplomacy as extension of battlefield

Ghalibaf outlined a pragmatic framework for Iran's current foreign policy, arguing that political negotiations must be leveraged to preserve the physical gains achieved by regional paramilitary forces.

"Diplomacy and negotiation must be able to untie military knots and consolidate the achievements of the fighters," Ghalibaf stated.

He noted that this objective is only achievable when a nation maintains an absolute state of defensive readiness alongside its diplomatic channels.

The speaker revealed key elements of the confidential text negotiated with the Trump administration.

He noted that Tehran successfully insisted on incorporating explicit clauses guaranteeing the territorial integrity of regional states and mandating an end to military operations targeting Iran's allies within the "Axis of Resistance."

Warnings to regional neighbors

Despite the active execution of the agreement, the parliamentary leader issued sharp ideological clarifications aimed at calming hardline factions within Tehran.

"There is no peace between us and the United States, and we will never recognize 'Israel'," Ghalibaf asserted in a series of urgent declarations carried by state media.

He framed the current truce purely as a tactical mechanism to safeguard Iranian state sovereignty amidst crushing economic and military pressures.

Concluding his address, Ghalibaf directed a message to neighboring Arab and Islamic governments, asserting that the current geopolitical climate has demonstrated the futility of relying on Western security umbrellas.

He claimed that regional capitals are increasingly realizing that normalization or strategic cooperation with Washington and Tel Aviv fails to guarantee their domestic security, urging a pivot toward localized, regional consensus.