Trump bars fans from four nations at World Cup 2026

• White House issues unprecedented ban on fans from four national teams for World Cup 2026.
• Decision sparks international outrage from affected countries over fairness and rights.

The White House has issued a presidential decision banning fans from four national teams from entering the United States during the 2026 FIFA World Cup, citing “national security” considerations.

The decision, which sources including L’Equipe and The Touchline reported was signed last week by President Donald Trump, bars ordinary supporters from traveling to the United States to cheer on their teams throughout the tournament.

Read more: Will heavy rain affect Jordan vs Morocco kickoff?

Officials framed the measure as necessary to protect public safety during the competition, but critics say the ban goes far beyond normal event security planning.

Nations on the banned list

The list of excluded fan bases includes supporters of the national teams of Senegal, Côte d’Ivoire (Ivory Coast), Iran, and Haiti. Reports also indicate that the list could expand to include the Democratic Republic of the Congo if that team secures qualification for the finals.

The decision represents a historical precedent in World Cup preparations, as it is the first time a host nation has explicitly denied access to the supporters of specific countries.

Limited exceptions for official delegations

Despite the strict ban on general attendance, the presidential text outlined very narrow exceptions. Players participating in the tournament, members of their technical and administrative staff, and their immediate family members will be allowed to enter the United States.

Read more: Italy's Meloni forced to auction gifts she received from world leaders for charity

These exceptions, officials said, are intended to ensure that the competition itself proceeds with the participation of all qualified teams, even if their fans are excluded from attending.

Outrage and criticism

The announcement immediately drew sharp criticism and widespread anger among sports communities and the public in the affected countries.

In West African capitals such as Dakar and Abidjan, officials and supporters reacted with outrage, saying the ban strikes at the core spirit of football and undermines the principle of equal treatment for all fans at the world’s premier sporting event.

Supporters from the banned nations expressed deep disappointment at being denied the chance to support their national teams in person on American soil, calling the policy unjust and discriminatory.

Global reactions

Criticism was not limited to West Africa. In Tehran and Port-au-Prince, commentators described the decision as arbitrary and unjustified, arguing that ordinary sports fans pose no threat and should not be barred from attending a global event that celebrates international competition and unity.

Human rights groups and international sports organizations have also raised questions about the legal and ethical implications of the ban, with some calling for urgent dialogue between the United States, FIFA, and the affected federations.

What’s next?

As the World Cup draws closer, the controversy over fan access adds a complex and highly political dimension to preparations. With qualification matches still to decide some participating teams, attention will now turn to whether the list of banned supporters expands and how world football governing bodies will respond.

For fans from the excluded countries, what was meant to be a once-in-a-lifetime sporting pilgrimage has become a flashpoint in a broader debate over security, rights, and the inclusive spirit of the beautiful game.